Project description
Our people write genuinely good material: notes from finished projects, plain explanations of how our industry actually works, answers to the questions clients ask us every single week. All of it currently lives in social feeds. A post gets its two days of attention, then it sinks. Nobody can dig it up later, search engines never really index it, and a week after publication a colleague is retyping the same explanation by hand for the next client. We are effectively paying for expertise twice and keeping it nowhere.
So we want that library on our own site, in a section built to be read and to be found. A list of articles with categories and tags, author cards with a short bio and everything that person has written, related reading at the end of each piece, search inside the section, a subscription form for new articles, a table of contents pinned beside long reads, an honest reading-time estimate, structured markup so search engines understand what the page is, and preview cards that look correct when someone drops a link into a messenger.
Inside, our staff needs an editor they will not fight with: write, attach a cover, pick a category, set the author, save a draft, and get a clear refusal if a required field is missing rather than a half-empty page going live. We do not need a publishing empire; we need one section that works properly on a phone and keeps working when there are three hundred articles in it instead of thirty.
What we expect in the scope:
— article list with categories and tags, paging and sensible sorting;
— author cards: photo, short bio, list of that author's articles;
— related materials block at the end of every article;
— search within the section, including by tag;
— subscription to new articles, confirmed by a letter to the address given, with an unsubscribe link in every letter we send;
— side table of contents for long reads, reading-time estimate, share buttons;
— structured markup for search engines and correct preview cards for messengers;
— editor for our staff with required-field validation before publishing;
— images only from sources that grant the right to use them, never pulled out of an image search;
— a draft must not be reachable by a direct link before it is published, and we want that verified as a separate check, not assumed;
— responsive layout, readable typography, decent loading speed on mobile.
So we want that library on our own site, in a section built to be read and to be found. A list of articles with categories and tags, author cards with a short bio and everything that person has written, related reading at the end of each piece, search inside the section, a subscription form for new articles, a table of contents pinned beside long reads, an honest reading-time estimate, structured markup so search engines understand what the page is, and preview cards that look correct when someone drops a link into a messenger.
Inside, our staff needs an editor they will not fight with: write, attach a cover, pick a category, set the author, save a draft, and get a clear refusal if a required field is missing rather than a half-empty page going live. We do not need a publishing empire; we need one section that works properly on a phone and keeps working when there are three hundred articles in it instead of thirty.
What we expect in the scope:
— article list with categories and tags, paging and sensible sorting;
— author cards: photo, short bio, list of that author's articles;
— related materials block at the end of every article;
— search within the section, including by tag;
— subscription to new articles, confirmed by a letter to the address given, with an unsubscribe link in every letter we send;
— side table of contents for long reads, reading-time estimate, share buttons;
— structured markup for search engines and correct preview cards for messengers;
— editor for our staff with required-field validation before publishing;
— images only from sources that grant the right to use them, never pulled out of an image search;
— a draft must not be reachable by a direct link before it is published, and we want that verified as a separate check, not assumed;
— responsive layout, readable typography, decent loading speed on mobile.
Web development Cash, Bank transfer
