1
Екатерина
no recommendations
no complaints
Project title: Describe an already invented idea
Type of cooperation: One-time project
Section: Education and consulting
Prepayment: prepayment is possible
Payment methods: Cash, Bank transfer, Electronic money
Acceptance of requests: from 2025-07-17 until 2025-07-22
Type of cooperation: One-time project
Section: Education and consulting
Prepayment: prepayment is possible
Payment methods: Cash, Bank transfer, Electronic money
Acceptance of requests: from 2025-07-17 until 2025-07-22
Project description:
Offering extra earnings. It is necessary to help to describe in detail the already invented idea of the principle of automatic selection of the object of desk customs inspection. That is, the topic: Improving the selection of objects of the chamber customs inspection in terms of digitalization.
The idea is below (it should be written into 8 pages of which 2 are already available):
Based on the results of the inspections, we enter information (DT, Name of the office, inn, What goods, Old code, new code after adjustment, damage), which was checked into a single database of identified risks (EBRM)
Allegedly, this can contribute to the further selection of objects and trigger risk in a set of aggregate factors for which violations were identified: according to the product code, for example, the name of the goods according to 31 columns, respectively, the code according to 33 columns, according to the manufacturer even, according to the licensee too, according to the right holder, but the licensee is too deep factors.
Let’s say that we enter information into the system, it automatically identifies potential objects of control among the databases, informs DL with a list of information that could affect a particular violation (I suggest that we consider a violation everywhere in terms of applying a code with zero duty, and in fact the code should not be zero, it is easier)
Accordingly, the DL on risk information checks the reliability and, if appropriate, opens the check.
And, add that the system itself calculates the economic damage.
Because if the damage is 50 grand, why would we waste time on it?
The result is the information from the system:
Member of foreign trade, respectively, TIN, DT, goods, code declared, code during inspection, name of goods and reference to the completed inspection, so that the inspector could read the act of the inspection and applied as a help in his
And, add to that, to take into account the jurisprudence of the case.
If the customs case lost, then when the risk was triggered, there was also a reference to cases won or not.
If you are interested, I will send a file with the beginning of two pages describing this idea, which should be described in more detail. The task is simple if you are an expert in this field. Thanks for the time.
Offering extra earnings. It is necessary to help to describe in detail the already invented idea of the principle of automatic selection of the object of desk customs inspection. That is, the topic: Improving the selection of objects of the chamber customs inspection in terms of digitalization.
The idea is below (it should be written into 8 pages of which 2 are already available):
Based on the results of the inspections, we enter information (DT, Name of the office, inn, What goods, Old code, new code after adjustment, damage), which was checked into a single database of identified risks (EBRM)
Allegedly, this can contribute to the further selection of objects and trigger risk in a set of aggregate factors for which violations were identified: according to the product code, for example, the name of the goods according to 31 columns, respectively, the code according to 33 columns, according to the manufacturer even, according to the licensee too, according to the right holder, but the licensee is too deep factors.
Let’s say that we enter information into the system, it automatically identifies potential objects of control among the databases, informs DL with a list of information that could affect a particular violation (I suggest that we consider a violation everywhere in terms of applying a code with zero duty, and in fact the code should not be zero, it is easier)
Accordingly, the DL on risk information checks the reliability and, if appropriate, opens the check.
And, add that the system itself calculates the economic damage.
Because if the damage is 50 grand, why would we waste time on it?
The result is the information from the system:
Member of foreign trade, respectively, TIN, DT, goods, code declared, code during inspection, name of goods and reference to the completed inspection, so that the inspector could read the act of the inspection and applied as a help in his
And, add to that, to take into account the jurisprudence of the case.
If the customs case lost, then when the risk was triggered, there was also a reference to cases won or not.
If you are interested, I will send a file with the beginning of two pages describing this idea, which should be described in more detail. The task is simple if you are an expert in this field. Thanks for the time.
