Elevated protection for the video project
Employer
[no-member:pro]Mikhail[/no-member:pro]Mikhail
Project parameters
Type of cooperationOne-time project
SectionSoftware development
Prepaymentprepayment is possible
Payment methodsCash, Bank transfer, Electronic money
Acceptance of requestsclosed
Project description
Good afternoon. Protection for the video course must be developed.
The video course is currently protected by StarForce Audio/Video.
StarForce Audio/Video is an interactive shell (player) that decrypts content with a key and plays it.
That protection is not enough.
You need to develop another protection and put it over StarForce Audio/Video.
As I imagine it, you need to write an external software shell that will load the video course previously protected by StarForce Audio/Video (run through yourself). And this outer shell will be protected by VMProtect SenseLock Edition, Guardant SP, or other software key.
I am ready to consider any other proposed algorithms.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A more detailed description of the problem:
Why is StarForce Audio/Video not enough? The infoprotector has a similar principle of operation. It is also an interactive shell (player), which decrypts the content with the key and plays it. About StarForce Audio / Video can not say, but the infoprotector is hacked one or two or three. Despite the fact that it has protection against grabbers and running on a virtual machine, no one robs video from the screen. Because three days after the video course is released, encrypted files are pulled out of containers and distributed free of charge. It is so easy to hack that to shoot with an external camera from the screen 130 hour video course will be longer and more expensive.
Obviously, there is no 100% protection. But it is necessary to protect the project in such a way that its hacking is not economically profitable. So that immediately after the release of the video course you do not find a pirated distribution in which the original files are lying along with containers in which they were once encrypted by an infoprotector or StarForce Audio / Video.
So basically, in my view, the protection problem that I'm asking you to consider is no different than the protection of a regular application. That is, an external application is created that loads and drags through another application, namely StarForce Audio / Video. And this external application is protected by a software key. It turns out that the attacker will first need to crack the protection of an external application, which is protected by VMProtect SenseLock Edition or Guardand SP, in order to access StarForce Audio / Video, and then also break StarForce Audio / Video. I think that such protection may well make this hacking economically unprofitable, although, of course, I may be wrong.
The video course is currently protected by StarForce Audio/Video.
StarForce Audio/Video is an interactive shell (player) that decrypts content with a key and plays it.
That protection is not enough.
You need to develop another protection and put it over StarForce Audio/Video.
As I imagine it, you need to write an external software shell that will load the video course previously protected by StarForce Audio/Video (run through yourself). And this outer shell will be protected by VMProtect SenseLock Edition, Guardant SP, or other software key.
I am ready to consider any other proposed algorithms.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A more detailed description of the problem:
Why is StarForce Audio/Video not enough? The infoprotector has a similar principle of operation. It is also an interactive shell (player), which decrypts the content with the key and plays it. About StarForce Audio / Video can not say, but the infoprotector is hacked one or two or three. Despite the fact that it has protection against grabbers and running on a virtual machine, no one robs video from the screen. Because three days after the video course is released, encrypted files are pulled out of containers and distributed free of charge. It is so easy to hack that to shoot with an external camera from the screen 130 hour video course will be longer and more expensive.
Obviously, there is no 100% protection. But it is necessary to protect the project in such a way that its hacking is not economically profitable. So that immediately after the release of the video course you do not find a pirated distribution in which the original files are lying along with containers in which they were once encrypted by an infoprotector or StarForce Audio / Video.
So basically, in my view, the protection problem that I'm asking you to consider is no different than the protection of a regular application. That is, an external application is created that loads and drags through another application, namely StarForce Audio / Video. And this external application is protected by a software key. It turns out that the attacker will first need to crack the protection of an external application, which is protected by VMProtect SenseLock Edition or Guardand SP, in order to access StarForce Audio / Video, and then also break StarForce Audio / Video. I think that such protection may well make this hacking economically unprofitable, although, of course, I may be wrong.
